Slashdot Asks: Are Remote Software Teams More Productive?

A recruiter with 20 years of experience recently reported on the research into whether remote software teams perform better. One study of 10,000 coding sessions concluded it takes 10-15 minutes for a programmer to resume work after an interruption. Another study actually suggests unsupervised workers are more productive, and the founders of the collaboration tool Basecamp argue the bigger danger is burnout when motivated employees overwork themselves. mikeatTB shares his favorite part of the article:
One interesting take on the issues is raised by ThoughtWorks’ Martin Fowler: Individuals are more productive in a co-located environment, but remote teams are often more productive than co-located teams. This is because a remote team has the advantage of hiring without geographic boundaries, and that enables employers to assemble world-class groups.
The article shares some interesting anecdotes from remote workers, but I’d be interested to hear from Slashdot’s readers. Leave your own experiences in the comments, and tell us what you think. Are remote software teams more productive?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&id=10264469&smallembed=1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.